data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/446a4/446a4ce00baa08923bd075139d73272f825eafe2" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/446a4/446a4ce00baa08923bd075139d73272f825eafe2" alt=""
Hi
As you know I did the Dunwich Dynamo at the weekend and thought long and hard which technology to take to record it.
My Canon EOS 500 digital camera got rejected (too heavy)
so I took the following:
- Apple nano (my wifes) with a belkin voice recorder attached for a podcast recorder.
- Sony cybershot 3.2MP digtal camera
- Nokia 6234 phone
so I used the
nano once at the start.
Camera at the start outside a pub (15 miles in) at the mid point (64 odd miles) got three shots in before condensation of the village hall fogged it up.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/80adc/80adcb7314edd937e3eebeb9943bcc737ad7510e" alt=""
The phone to ring my wife fifteen miles and an hour from the end . plus 4 or 5 texts along the way .
so why didn't I use it more "The weather it poured down" The camera didn't work well because I didn't take a case and it got cold and was a focus point for condensation when I got it out at the mid point. The nano wasn't robust enough in the wet and I could be bothered .
The phone work but wasn't ideal to use in the dark.
so one device to all those jobs would I have used it more would a ruggedised version of devices made it more useful. I don't know but it does suggest technology wont get used if its not easy and reliable